Weldon Boyd Shooting: Latest Updates & Lawsuit Aftermath
Did a routine road rage incident in North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, escalate into a fatal shooting with far-reaching legal and personal consequences? The tragic events of September 2023, involving Scott Spivey and Weldon Boyd, paint a complex picture of violence, self-defense claims, and the enduring impact on those left behind.
The tranquility of North Myrtle Beach was shattered in September when a confrontation on Highway 9 and Camp Swamp Road led to the death of Scott Spivey. The incident quickly became a focal point for law enforcement, the legal system, and the community. Early reports pointed to a road rage incident as the catalyst, a common occurrence that, in this case, culminated in gunfire. Authorities initially focused their investigation on the circumstances surrounding the shooting, piecing together witness statements, forensic evidence, and the accounts of those involved.
At the heart of the matter was Weldon Boyd, identified as the owner of "Buoys on the Boulevard," a popular North Myrtle Beach establishment. Also involved was Kenneth Williams. The investigation revealed that Boyd was the second shooter in the incident, adding another layer of complexity to the narrative. The subsequent actions taken by the authorities, and the reactions of those affected, would shape the course of events. The involvement of 15th Circuit Solicitor Jimmy Richardson, as confirmed in a letter to the South Carolina Attorney General's office, marked a critical juncture in the legal proceedings. The confirmation linked Spivey and Boyd directly to the shooting, setting the stage for potential legal action.
| Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Weldon Boyd |
| Occupation | Business Owner |
| Business | Buoys on the Boulevard, North Myrtle Beach |
| Location of Incident | North Myrtle Beach, SC (Highway 9 and Camp Swamp Road) |
| Date of Incident | September 9, 2023 |
| Involved Parties | Scott Spivey, Kenneth Williams |
| Legal Status | The state attorney generals office in April declined to prosecute Boyd. The estate of Scott Spivey filed a wrongful death lawsuit. |
| Reference | Search Results on Google |
The estate of Scott Spivey took legal action, filing a wrongful death lawsuit against Weldon Boyd and Kenneth Williams. This move underscored the family's determination to seek justice and hold those responsible accountable for the events that led to Scott Spivey's death. The lawsuit not only sought compensation for the loss but also aimed to shed light on the details surrounding the shooting, potentially challenging the initial findings of the investigation. The legal battle was poised to delve into the specifics of the encounter, exploring the motives, actions, and justifications of each person involved. It placed Boyd under heightened scrutiny.
Photographs, such as the one obtained from Weldon Boyd's phone showing bullet holes in his Dodge Ram truck, became vital pieces of evidence, offering visual confirmation of the violence that had taken place. The graphic imagery was a stark reminder of the tragic events, reinforcing the seriousness of the situation. They were used to help reconstruct the sequence of events and determine the trajectory of the bullets. Additionally, the 911 calls made by Boyd, who investigators claimed shot and killed Spivey, were released as part of the official record. These calls offered an unfiltered look into the immediate aftermath of the shooting and the emotional state of those involved. The recorded phone calls provided a firsthand account of events, allowing investigators and the public to assess the situation as it unfolded.
The information contained in the 911 calls and police reports highlighted the perspectives of Boyd and another caller, as they told dispatchers what they had seen. The recorded statements provided critical insights into the circumstances surrounding the shooting. Details about the driver of a black vehicle, the actions leading up to the confrontation, and the sequence of events immediately before the gunfire, were documented in the reports. Police reports also detailed the available evidence and witness statements.
The decision to close the investigation drew criticism and sparked further questions. Spivey's family was angered by the eventual closure, reflecting their conviction that the investigation fell short of providing the complete picture. The subsequent wrongful death lawsuit further illustrated the familys determination to pursue all available avenues for justice and transparency. The family's continued pursuit of answers was a reflection of their deep grief. The closing of the investigation left many unanswered questions about the events, leading to scrutiny of the investigation process and a renewed call for accountability.
In the aftermath of the shooting, Boyd was identified as the second shooter in the incident. The disclosure added a new layer of complexity to the case. The announcement of Boyd's involvement as a shooter raised new questions about the events that had transpired on Highway 9. Horry County Police Chief Kris Leonhardt acknowledged the ongoing questions and reached out to the FBI and SLED (South Carolina Law Enforcement Division). This step underscored the importance of ensuring the integrity and impartiality of the investigation. The involvement of federal agencies signaled the importance of scrutinizing the incident from multiple angles and assessing all available evidence.
The shooting itself took place on September 9, 2023. Authorities later stated that Boyd and Kenneth Williams shot and killed Scott Spivey during what was described as a road rage incident. Boyd, the owner of Buoys on the Boulevard, and Williams were accused of playing an active role in the fatal confrontation. The details of the road rage incident were also brought to light. The details highlighted the circumstances that led to the confrontation. The incident began as a minor disagreement between drivers but quickly escalated into violence.
The narrative was further complicated by an excerpt from phone calls between Brandon Strickland and Weldon Boyd, which included key details. The details from these conversations potentially offer valuable context about the incident. The insights may also reveal the motivations and perceptions of the individuals involved. These calls were central to piecing together the full story of the tragic shooting.
The report reveals that Boyd told officers that he fired toward Spivey's vehicle after Spivey exited his truck and an altercation ensued. This account provided Boyds perspective on the events leading up to the shooting. It was also noted that Boyd was involved in an altercation with Kenneth Williams, further highlighting the circumstances. The details of the interaction helped to clarify the events. The inclusion of the information emphasized the complex and multifaceted nature of the situation.
In April, the state attorney generals office decided against prosecuting Boyd. The decision added another dimension to the legal drama. The decision prompted debate about the law and the legal standard of self-defense. These details were added in the account of the fatal incident.
In a 911 call made by Boyd on the day of the incident, he claimed Spivey pointed a gun at him while they were driving on Highway 9. In response to the alleged threat, Boyd stated he would respond to the threat if the gun was pointed at him again. The details were documented as part of the case.
The shooting in North Myrtle Beach remains a stark reminder of how quickly situations can escalate and the devastating impact they can have on individuals, families, and the community. As the legal proceedings unfold, the details surrounding the tragic events will be subject to further examination, with the hope of bringing some measure of resolution to all those affected.
